Questions people ask
Will you tell me the strategy is good so I keep paying you?
Look at the sample reports — the most-recommended strategy on the internet got a D. The grading is
mechanical: out-of-sample decay, cost sensitivity, segment consistency, and drawdown math decide the grade,
not me. Most strategies fail. That's the point of checking first.
Will you steal my strategy?
Private audits are confidential and never published. Bluntly: after auditing many strategies, the honest
finding is that almost none are worth stealing — and if yours is the exception, the report proves it's yours
first.
What can and can't be tested?
Rule-based strategies on stocks, ETFs, and major crypto: 15+ years of daily data, ~2 years of hourly.
What can't be tested yet: minute-bar day-trading systems, options strategies, and anything discretionary
("I enter when the chart feels right"). If I can't test it, you don't pay.
Is this financial advice?
No. It's historical research: what would these rules have done in the past, tested honestly. It's not a
recommendation to trade anything, and a good backtest is never a guarantee — the report says this too,
prominently.
Why should I trust your engine?
Every report ships with the full trade log (every entry, exit, fee, and slippage charge) so anything can be
independently verified. The methodology is printed inside each report: next-bar-open fills, pessimistic
stop-before-target bar resolution, no look-ahead indicators, mark-to-market drawdowns.